How do you document real life?


Hi, I'm Lauren!
(or rdm, if you prefer the shorter name with the longer story)

I'm 22, a university student and a self-confessed music nerd.

Here you'll find Glee, Disney, Sherlock, fic, musicals, pretty people, pretty things and my ramblings.
Oh and I have a tendency to overshare. Don't say I didn't warn you.


whynobritneybrittany:

wantthepharaohs:

whynobritneybrittany:

lamadeliadalai:

i honestly after all this time do not get the bi vs pan distinction

like i’ve just read so much and so many different things and yet it doesn’t click in my head?

It’s probably because the idea of bisexuality is defined in so many different ways. The original definition was meant to mean attraction to both males and females - ‘both’ sexes.  But the world is being more open to the idea nowadays that there are more than two sexes, so it confuses things.  So now a lot of people who identify as bisexual use it to mean they are attracted to the same as them and different from them, which they’re using to encompass pretty much everyone - though that mindset tends to be more associated with pansexuality, which people generally associate with ‘ability to be attracted to any person.’

But I think the distinction for me is more that… bisexuality by that definition, as I understand it (and I mean no offense to anyone if this is wrong or anything, I don’t proclaim to be a master of sexualities BY ANY MEANS, and like I said yesterday, I feel as if all people need to just adapt whatever label they want, if they want one, to their lives and how they feel personally regardless of what other people think or say or feel), focuses more on the sexual aspect of it. Not sexual meaning the ‘having sex’ aspect of it, but meaning ‘of or related to a person’s sex.’

It may mean you’re capable of being attracted to any of the genders (though technically, by definition, you’d think it would only mean attraction to two of them, due to the ‘bi’ part of it, but again, to each their own), but at least the way I understand pansexuality for myself is that… the gender/sex doesn’t matter at all to me.  It isn’t a factor in who I fall for, I guess?  I, personally, fall in love with personalities.  I couldn’t care less what body that personality is in.  I fall for people who make me laugh, and who I can have good long conversations with, and who I miss terribly when we’re apart, and who make me feel loved and special and… none of that is dependent on what parts you may or may not have or what you may or may not identify as.

I don’t know if this was at all helpful.  I’m quite tired after babysitting for hours tonight.  But that’s the way I feel about how I label myself, at least. Yeah.

that first paragraph where you explain “bi” as standing for “the same as me” and “different from me” instead of “male” and “female” is honestly the first time I’ve been able to coherently understand that distinction and how people explained bisexuality as being more than two genders. I’ve respected it before now, just not quite grasped the concept.  So yeah, this is SUPER helpful. I’m proud of you for sharing this and proud of you for being able to articulate it so well. <3

Awww, thank you. <3  It took me a while to understand it as well, but…. I’ve been reading up on stuff more and more these days, and yeah - I think that’s where the change in the adaptation of the term is coming from.


posted 1 week ago with 7 notes - via whynobritneybrittany © lamadeliadalai

The 60 Best Signs Against DOMA And Prop 8 At The Supreme Court 


posted 1 month ago with 20 notes - via kurtsieklyssa © whynobritneybrittany

magnicifent:

artsky7:

i just love this

I want to thank you for coming out of the closet, again and again, over and over, for the rest of your life. At school, at work, at your kid’s daycare, at your brother’s wedding, at the doctor’s office. Thank you for sideswiping their stereotypes.

I never get the chance to come out of the closet. For some reason, my closet was always made of glass. But you do it for me. You fight homophobia in a way that I never could.

Some of them think I am queer because I am undesirable. You prove to them that being queer is your desire.


posted 3 months ago with 97 notes - via stackedcrooked © artsky7

callmekitto:

thankyoucorndog:

venomairspace:

fuckyeahsexeducation:

kattahj:

Last year, a kid at work asked me to buy Världens viktigaste bok (“The World’s Most Important Book”). I looked it up and promptly bought it. Since then, it has been constantly lended out or in reservations, and only now have I had the opportunity to take it home and share a few pictures.
Sex ed books always get a dual reaction from the kids: “Ew, that’s gross!” and “Can I borrow it?” - quite often both from the same kid. :-) This has proven more popular than any of the others, which gladdens me, because it’s so good. It’s not just “Let’s tell the kids the basics about reproduction so they don’t get a shock when they enter puberty.” It’s “Let’s tell the kids everything we wish that we had been told in middle school.”


As you can tell from the pictures, it takes care to include a variety of bodies and sexual orientations. It also questions gender roles, portraying both the “factory” where boy things and girl things are packed into neat boxes, and the kids outside the factory trading with each other. The text is much the same. Take this excerpt, for instance:


“Many people who have a vagina feel like girls, and many who have a penis feel like boys. But it’s not always true. Sometimes the body doesn’t fit with how you feel. You can have a boy body but feel like a girl. Or have a girl body but feel like a boy. Your body doesn’t decide who you are, you decide it for yourself. You’re the one who knows if you’re a girl or a boy. Some people don’t feel like they’re boys or girls at all. Maybe you feel like both, or something else entirely. Or you don’t want to choose. There aren’t always words to fit with what you’re feeling, but that doesn’t make the feeling less true.”


The kids at work are conservative, as kids often are. (They have questioned both the fact that I’m still single, and the somewhat androgynous way I dress.) But they’re reading this stuff, in the library, in the classroom, at home. The school nurse, too, has recommended it as reading. I have every hope that for at least some of them, the message will be received.

I WANT THIS BOOK.

GOD BLESS SWEDEN

OH…

I’M FLAILING AROUND A LITTLE?? WHAT A WONDERFUL BOOK. So much better than what I got when I was that age, with barely a paragraph about homosexuals and absolutely nothing on trans* people or gender identity at all.

ALSO THE TEACHER IN THE THIRD TO LAST PICTURE HAS A ZELDA TATTOO??? OH MY GOD COULD THIS BOOK BE MORE PERFECT


posted 3 months ago with 14,369 notes - via devonwood © kattahj

stackedcrooked:

polkadotprincessmondo:

belaribel:

dicksp8jr:

polkadotprincessmondo:




Hi. Meet Keahu Kahuanui. He plays a character named Danny Mahealani on a show you might have heard of called Teen Wolf. Danny is gay. Danny is Hawaiian. If you want to talk about queer representation, he is right there, being all shirtless in the locker room, hanging out in gay bars, lusting after Derek Hale and taking a boy to the prom. If you want to talk about elevating white narratives in the name of queer representation, there’s good news, you don’t have to. Because there’s Danny Mehealani. Who is gay. Also Hawaiian. I realize he’s a secondary character, but because we care so deeply about queer representation, we could start a letter writing campaign to fix that. We won’t, but we could. So I guess the real question is why we elevate a couple of ostensibly straight white dudes with absolutely no chemistry at all over Danny Mehealani. Who is actually gay in canon. And also Hawaiian. 




also hot

A lot of shippers ship mains because they see the conflict between them and interpret it as sexual tension. It doesn’t mean they’re ignoring the actually canon gay character, they just happen to pair two others together. *shrug* 

Right, that must be what all the tooth gnashing and wailing about how not liking Sterek means you’re a homophobe and the desperate need to make them canon because queer representation is paramount is all about. I don’t care if people ship Sterek, I really don’t. My point is that if you’re looking for queer representation, the show already has it and when you make Sterek a crusade about queer representation, you are, in fact, ignoring a canon gay character. I’m not saying that it would be bad for there to be more, I’m just saying that shipping Sterek isn’t a blow for gay rights. If you don’t think that, then I’m not talking about you.

stackedcrooked:

polkadotprincessmondo:

belaribel:

dicksp8jr:

polkadotprincessmondo:

Hi. Meet Keahu Kahuanui. He plays a character named Danny Mahealani on a show you might have heard of called Teen Wolf. Danny is gay. Danny is Hawaiian. If you want to talk about queer representation, he is right there, being all shirtless in the locker room, hanging out in gay bars, lusting after Derek Hale and taking a boy to the prom. If you want to talk about elevating white narratives in the name of queer representation, there’s good news, you don’t have to. Because there’s Danny Mehealani. Who is gay. Also Hawaiian. I realize he’s a secondary character, but because we care so deeply about queer representation, we could start a letter writing campaign to fix that. We won’t, but we could. So I guess the real question is why we elevate a couple of ostensibly straight white dudes with absolutely no chemistry at all over Danny Mehealani. Who is actually gay in canon. And also Hawaiian. 

also hot

A lot of shippers ship mains because they see the conflict between them and interpret it as sexual tension. It doesn’t mean they’re ignoring the actually canon gay character, they just happen to pair two others together. *shrug* 

Right, that must be what all the tooth gnashing and wailing about how not liking Sterek means you’re a homophobe and the desperate need to make them canon because queer representation is paramount is all about. I don’t care if people ship Sterek, I really don’t. My point is that if you’re looking for queer representation, the show already has it and when you make Sterek a crusade about queer representation, you are, in fact, ignoring a canon gay character. I’m not saying that it would be bad for there to be more, I’m just saying that shipping Sterek isn’t a blow for gay rights. If you don’t think that, then I’m not talking about you.

image


posted 4 months ago with 1,051 notes - via stackedcrooked © polkadotprincessmondo

Russell Brand & the Westboro Baptist Church


posted 5 months ago with 80,540 notes - via whynobritneybrittany © raphmike

liquorinthefront:

This is so perfect! The cats! The Tegan and Sara poster! Two thumbs up, ladies! Ridiculously cute family/holiday photoset. Now I want to do one with my girlfriend and cat, but I doubt it would come out this perfect.


posted 5 months ago with 4,410 notes - via bespectacledcolfer © flickr.com

okay last thing on bisexuality for now i promise 

tehriz:

the last things I will say in this particular debate.

From A.J. Walkley’s really awesome article:

Then there is the thought that the binary view of bisexuality can be seen as phobic of anyone who identifies as genderqueer, or somewhere along the gender and sexuality spectrum, not identifying as male or female, man or woman. But, as I mentioned before, the true definition of “bisexual” is being attracted to those who are the same as me and those who are different from me, encompassing all genders and identities. The often-repeated argument that “bi means two” ignores a simple fact: “Same” and “different” are, indeed, two groups.

I would like to quote the whole article because it’s really good and also quotes Julia Serano again which is cool but this part seemed the most relevant to the discussion from a few days ago. I don’t agree with the point that pansexuality only comes with a rejection of bisexuality, because they’re different things and different orientations, but mostly yes this is how I feel.

From the Bisexual Manifesto (written in 1990),

Bisexuality is a whole, fluid identity. Do not assume that bisexuality is binary or duogamous in nature: that we have “two” sides or that we must be involved simultaneously with both genders to be fulfilled human beings. In fact, don’t assume that there are only two genders.

and now I’m done.


posted 5 months ago with 82 notes - via tehriz

barefootwits:

anescapedfish:

panicatthewhorehouse:

god-particle:

wonderfloniumandfezzes:

nerdsforthebirds:

neurophagy:

sonnetstockmar:

a bisexual pop group called Both Directions

a pansexual pop group called All Directions

an asexual pop group called No Directions

a questioning pop group called Which Direction

a helpful pop group called That Direction

a lost pop group called Can I Have Directions

a married pop group called Dammit Why Won’t You Just Ask For Directions

a transgender pop group called Opposite Directions


posted 6 months ago with 226,718 notes - via barefootwits © sonnetstockmar

snuggle-monster:

“You see, it’s totally fine and socially acceptable for a girl to act in a homosexual manner, whereas it’s not for a guy. Y’know what I mean, yeah. A chick making out with her friends just for fun, as well as hot lesbians, y’know. But with guys, it’s different. You can’t just be a dude going around making out with your mates when you’re drunk, y’know. People’ll think you’re a guy who’s actually that way, whereas people know girls are just making out with their friends.”

“But don’t get me wrong, I’m all for equal marriage and stuff. But, you know what I mean, yeah?”

“I’m sorry, I don’t mean to be rude, but I think perhaps you’ve struck up the topic of sexuality and gender roles with the wrong person in this office. But I’ll mull it over with my girlfriend and let you know what we think.” 

- Conversation with a guy in my office at lunch today.

(Perhaps an unnecessarily audacious response, but it seemed to get the message across.)

Oh, snap


posted 7 months ago with 4 notes - via snuggle-monster